Nobody likes to be threatened.
Intimidating or threatening tactics can feel even more challenging in a business or professional context, mainly because it can feel even more critical to respond in the appropriate way – a task that can feel impossible when you’ve been emotionally triggered.
That said, effectively navigating these tough scenarios is possible.
We start by first understanding the anatomy of a typical threat.
The Anatomy of a Threat
At face value, a threat is anytime your conversation partner implies they will orchestrate a negative outcome if their particular demands aren’t met. It’s important to recognize that threats are equal parts substantive and emotional. While the substantive portion focuses on the specific consequences they threaten to impose, the emotional aspect is equally significant.
Understanding the anatomy of a threat (50% substantive and 50% emotional) is essential to learning how to navigate the remainder of the conversation effectively. Oftentimes, negotiators fail to prepare for the emotional impact that certain conversational triggers can have.
Recognize Fear & Resist Immediate Responses
Typically, if somebody threatens you their goal is to induce fear so that you will do what they want. This is problematic for numerous reasons, one of the most obvious ones being that if you give into this tactic, you could find yourself in a scenario where you are consistently bullied out of the deal that you really want.
Recognize that fear can cloud judgment and lead to impulsive decision-making. Responding immediately to threats may establish a dangerous precedent where you consistently yield to their demands, undermining the balance of power in the relationship. Instead, practice restraint and avoid making substantive concessions in the heat of the moment. Adopt a long-term perspective that serves your best interests.
Pause, Ask, and Gather Information
Instead of becoming offended, or immediately giving in to the demands, try to view this tactic as an opportunity for you to gather valuable information. Focus on strategic information gathering, rather than provoking defensiveness by aggressively challenging their position. This prevents psychological entrenchment, a phenomenon where direct challenges will only cause your opponent to dig their heels into their position.
Indirectly challenge their claims and intentions by seeking insights that shed light on their motivations and concerns. You may start by recognizing their intense desire to force this one particular outcome while also inquiring about why they feel so strongly. It may also be worthwhile to find out if this pressure is coming from another source (other leadership in the company). Your goal is to gather as much information as possible while maintaining a productive dialogue.
Set Expectations and Prepare:
Avoid deciding in the moment. As the conversation concludes, express that it is unlikely for you to meet their demands but commit to looking into the matter and following up. This sets realistic expectations while giving you the opportunity to prepare and make informed decisions devoid of heightened emotions. Preparation increases your chances of success at the negotiation table and positions you as a strategic partner rather than an adversary.
Case Study: Navigating Single Source Suppliers
Threatening tactics can occur often in procurement and supply chain negotiations. Consider the following scenario:
You are in a procurement negotiation space where a company heavily relies on a single source supplier for a critical component. The supplier, aware of their leverage, threatens a substantial price increase. To apply our negotiation techniques, the procurement team should:
Pause and Gather Information:
Pause before responding to the threat and focus on gathering insights. Ask open-ended questions that encourage the supplier to reveal their underlying motivations and concerns. Understanding their perspective and potential alternatives helps you craft a strategic response.
Indirectly Challenge and Seek Common Ground:
Avoid aggressive questioning that triggers defensiveness. Instead, challenge their position indirectly by presenting alternative scenarios or probing their understanding of market dynamics. Seek areas of common ground and explore mutually beneficial solutions.
Set Realistic Expectations:
At the conclusion of the discussion, communicate that meeting their demands is unlikely. However, commit to thoroughly examining the situation and exploring potential avenues for cost reduction or alternative sourcing. This demonstrates your willingness to engage in finding a resolution.
Preparation and Strategy:
Take time to analyze the gathered information, evaluate alternative options, and identify potential negotiation strategies. Consider scenarios such as diversifying suppliers, renegotiating contract terms, or exploring cost-saving opportunities through process optimization. By entering subsequent negotiations with a well-prepared strategy, you increase your chances of achieving favorable outcomes.
Threatening tactics are the last thing anybody wants to deal with during an already difficult negotiation. By employing these negotiation techniques, professionals in the procurement space and beyond can navigate tough conversations with powerful opponents, reduce reliance on single source arrangements, and build more balanced and mutually beneficial relationships.
Read the full article here